Back to Comparisons

Best Clio Alternatives for Law Firms (2025 Comparison)

Compare the top Clio alternatives including MyCase, PracticePanther, Laurel AI, Timely, and ReadyDone. Honest pros and cons for each option.

December 14, 2025
12 min read

Clio dominates legal practice management with 150,000+ users and 35 G2 badges. It earned that position. But market leadership does not mean it fits every firm.

This guide compares Clio against its major competitors with honest pros and cons for each option. No sales pitch, just the facts.

Quick Comparison

SoftwareBest ForStarting PriceTime TrackingFull Practice Mgmt
ClioFull-service firms$49/user/moManualYes
MyCaseBudget-conscious$39/user/moManualYes
PracticePantherSolo/small firms$49/user/moManual + timersYes
Rocket MatterTime-focused billing$65/user/moManual + timersYes
CosmoLexBuilt-in accounting$99/user/moManualYes
SmokeballAuto time capture$49/user/moAutomaticYes
LEAPDocument automation$119/user/moManualYes
TimeSolvPure billing focus$27/user/moManual + timersNo
Laurel AIEnterprise firmsCustomAutomatic + AINo
TimelyGeneral auto-tracking$11/user/moAutomaticNo
ReadyDoneZero-effort tracking$100/user/moAutomatic + AINo

Clio

Best for: Mid-size to large firms wanting a comprehensive, well-supported platform

Clio is the market leader for good reason. It has the largest integration ecosystem (200+ apps), extensive features, and strong brand recognition with clients.

Pricing:

  • EasyStart: $49/user/month
  • Essentials: $79/user/month
  • Advanced: $109/user/month
  • Complete: $149/user/month (includes Clio Grow CRM)

Pros:

  • Most integrations of any legal software (200+)
  • Intuitive interface with reasonable learning curve
  • Strong mobile apps for iOS and Android
  • Excellent document management
  • Large user community and resources
  • Regular feature updates

Cons:

  • Expensive at higher tiers ($149/user for Complete)
  • Recent user complaints about declining support quality
  • Reports of billing issues after cancellation
  • Two-factor authentication reportedly unreliable
  • Client portal lacks search functionality
  • Gets pricey as you add non-billing users
  • No automatic time tracking (manual entry only)

Bottom line: Clio works well for firms that need extensive integrations and can justify the cost. If you use 10+ integrations regularly, Clio makes sense. If you use three, you are paying for 197 you do not need.


Practice Management Alternatives

MyCase

Best for: Small firms wanting Clio-level features at lower cost

MyCase delivers 80% of Clio's functionality at 60-70% of the price. Client communication is its strongest feature.

Pricing:

  • Basic: $39/user/month
  • Pro: $69/user/month
  • Advanced: $89/user/month
  • Complete: $119/user/month

Pros:

  • Significantly cheaper than Clio at every tier
  • Excellent client portal and communication tools
  • Clean, easy-to-learn interface
  • Good mobile apps
  • eSignature included in Pro and above
  • Strong document management

Cons:

  • Fewer integrations than Clio (40+ vs 200+)
  • Reporting less customizable
  • No built-in accounting (QuickBooks required)
  • Limited workflow automation compared to Clio
  • Smaller user community

Best for firms that: Want solid practice management without paying Clio prices. A five-attorney firm saves $2,400-$3,600/year vs Clio.


PracticePanther

Best for: Solo practitioners and firms under 10 attorneys who prioritize simplicity

PracticePanther wins on ease of use. Most attorneys are productive within hours, not days.

Pricing:

  • Solo: $49/user/month
  • Essential: $69/user/month
  • Business: $89/user/month
  • Enterprise: $99/user/month

Pros:

  • Extremely intuitive interface
  • Fast onboarding and setup
  • Strong mobile experience
  • Built-in payment processing (no extra fees)
  • Two-way text messaging with clients
  • Good workflow automation

Cons:

  • Document automation locked to higher tiers
  • Client portal less polished than Clio or MyCase
  • Fewer advanced customization options
  • Integrations not as extensive as Clio
  • Limited matter templates

Best for firms that: Value simplicity over feature depth. If your current software requires a manual to use, PracticePanther is the antidote.


Rocket Matter

Best for: Firms that prioritize detailed time tracking and billing accuracy

Rocket Matter started as a time and billing tool before expanding to full practice management. That DNA shows in its billing features.

Pricing:

  • Essentials: $65/user/month
  • Pro: $85/user/month
  • Premier: $99/user/month

Pros:

  • Excellent time tracking with multiple timer options
  • Strong pre-bill editing workflow
  • Detailed billing reports
  • Project management with task dependencies
  • Chrome extension for quick time capture
  • Good matter budgeting tools

Cons:

  • Higher starting price than MyCase or PracticePanther
  • Interface feels dated compared to newer competitors
  • Fewer integrations than Clio
  • Mobile app less polished
  • Document management not as strong

Best for firms that: Bill by the hour and want to maximize billing accuracy. If capturing every minute matters to your bottom line, Rocket Matter delivers.


CosmoLex

Best for: Firms wanting built-in accounting without QuickBooks dependency

CosmoLex eliminates the need for separate accounting software. Legal accounting, trust accounting, and IOLTA compliance are built in.

Pricing:

  • CosmoLex: $99/user/month
  • CosmoLex Plus: $129/user/month (includes CRM)

Pros:

  • Full legal accounting built in (no QuickBooks)
  • Trust accounting with three-way reconciliation
  • IOLTA compliance tracking
  • Time, billing, and accounting in one system
  • Eliminates sync issues between systems
  • Strong for trust-heavy practices

Cons:

  • Higher starting price than most alternatives
  • Steeper learning curve for accounting features
  • Fewer practice management features than Clio
  • Interface not as modern
  • Overkill if you already have accounting handled

Best for firms that: Handle client funds regularly (estate, real estate, family law). If trust accounting compliance keeps you up at night, CosmoLex solves that problem.


Smokeball

Best for: Small firms wanting automatic time tracking built into practice management

Smokeball stands out with AutoTime, which captures time automatically as you work. No timers to start. No manual entry required.

Pricing:

  • Bill: $49/user/month
  • Boost: $89/user/month
  • Grow: Custom (includes AutoTime)
  • Prosper+: Custom (includes AutoTime and AI features)

Pros:

  • Automatic time tracking (AutoTime) on higher tiers
  • Strong document automation with templates
  • 200+ pre-built matter types
  • Access to 20,000+ federal and local court forms
  • Good reporting and analytics
  • No data storage limits

Cons:

  • AutoTime only included in higher-priced tiers (add-on for Grow)
  • Primarily Windows-focused (Mac support limited)
  • Pricing not transparent (must contact sales)
  • Can be complex to set up initially
  • Less intuitive than PracticePanther

Best for firms that: Want automatic time capture as part of their practice management. If you hate starting timers, Smokeball removes that friction.


LEAP

Best for: Firms wanting strong document automation and workflow templates

LEAP emphasizes document automation and pre-built workflows for specific practice areas.

Pricing:

  • Starts at $119/user/month (custom pricing based on firm size)
  • 36-month price guarantee available

Pros:

  • Excellent document automation
  • Pre-built workflows for many practice areas
  • All-in-one system (no add-ons needed)
  • Strong for high-volume practices
  • Includes legal accounting
  • Good training and onboarding

Cons:

  • Higher starting price ($119/user)
  • Implementation can cost $1,000-$10,000+
  • Complex to set up and customize
  • 36-month contracts lock you in
  • Value for money rating of 3.6/5 on review sites
  • Overkill for simple practices

Best for firms that: Process high volumes of similar matters and can leverage document automation. Personal injury, conveyancing, and immigration firms often see strong ROI.


TimeSolv

Best for: Budget-conscious firms that only need time tracking and billing

TimeSolv is not full practice management. It focuses exclusively on time tracking, billing, and expense management.

Pricing:

  • TimeSolv Pro: $27/user/month
  • TimeSolv Legal: $47/user/month

Pros:

  • Most affordable option by far
  • Simple, focused time entry
  • Chrome extension for quick captures
  • Decent expense tracking
  • Client invoice portal
  • Easy to learn

Cons:

  • No document management
  • No client portal (just invoice access)
  • No matter management or calendaring
  • Requires separate tools for full practice management
  • Limited reporting compared to full suites
  • No automatic time tracking

Best for firms that: Already have document management and just need affordable billing. Often paired with other tools.


Automatic Time Tracking Alternatives

These tools focus specifically on capturing time automatically rather than full practice management.

Laurel AI

Best for: Large firms wanting enterprise-grade automatic time tracking with AI

Laurel (formerly Time By Ping) is the most established AI time tracking platform for legal. It raised $155.7M in funding and serves major law firms.

Pricing:

  • Custom pricing (contact for quote)
  • Typically enterprise-focused

Pros:

  • Passive time capture across all devices and apps
  • AI-generated billing narratives
  • Smart Work Coding assigns billing codes automatically
  • Compliance module flags non-compliant narratives
  • Integrates with Elite 3E, Aderant, Clio, and other systems
  • SOC II Type II certified, HIPAA compliant
  • Claims +28 daily billable minutes recovered

Cons:

  • No public pricing (enterprise sales process)
  • English only (no other languages supported)
  • Support quality inconsistent (some reports of unresponsive staff)
  • ROI can be difficult to measure precisely
  • Overkill for small firms
  • Requires behavior change from attorneys

Best for firms that: Are large enough to justify enterprise pricing and want the most established AI time tracking solution. AmLaw 100 firms are typical users.


Timely

Best for: General automatic time tracking at accessible pricing

Timely offers automatic time tracking for any profession, not just legal. It captures activity across apps and generates timesheets automatically.

Pricing:

  • Starter: $11/user/month (max 5 users, 20 projects)
  • Premium: $20/user/month (max 50 users)
  • Unlimited: $28/user/month
  • Annual billing saves 22%

Pros:

  • Affordable compared to legal-specific tools
  • Automatic time tracking across apps
  • AI timesheets reduce manual entry
  • Clean, modern interface
  • Privacy-focused (no screenshots or keystroke logging)
  • Works for 5,000+ businesses

Cons:

  • Not built for legal (no billing code suggestions, no compliance features)
  • Mobile app less reliable than desktop
  • AI sometimes misclassifies tasks
  • Does not integrate with legal billing systems
  • Starter plan limited to 5 users, 20 projects
  • No offline time tracking
  • Email support only (no live chat)
  • 53% of reviewers cite pricing concerns

Best for firms that: Want affordable automatic time tracking and can handle manual export to their billing system. Solo attorneys and very small firms may find it sufficient.


ReadyDone

Best for: Attorneys who want fully automatic time tracking with zero manual effort

ReadyDone captures time automatically from screen activity and uses AI to identify billable work. No timers to start. No apps to switch between. It runs in the background and generates time entries for you.

Pricing:

  • $100/user/month or $1,000/year

Pros:

  • Fully automatic time capture from screen activity
  • Easiest setup of any time tracking tool
  • AI identifies billable work and suggests entries
  • Works alongside existing practice management software
  • No behavior change required (no timers, no manual entry)
  • Reduces the 10-40% of billable time typically lost to poor tracking

Cons:

  • Higher price point than basic time tracking tools ($100/mo vs $11-30/mo)
  • Newer to market than established players like Laurel
  • Does not replace full practice management (no document storage, calendaring)
  • Requires comfort with screen activity capture

Best for firms that: Want to recover lost billable hours without changing how they work. If you hate timers and forget to log time, ReadyDone eliminates that problem entirely.


How to Choose

By Firm Size

Solo practitioners: PracticePanther or Timely for simplicity and low cost. If you bill hourly and lose time to poor tracking, ReadyDone pays for itself quickly.

2-10 attorneys: MyCase, Rocket Matter, or Smokeball. Balance of features and price without enterprise overhead.

10+ attorneys: Clio, CosmoLex, or LEAP. Scalability and advanced permissions justify higher costs.

AmLaw 100: Laurel AI for time tracking, paired with enterprise practice management.

By Practice Area

Trust-heavy practices (estate, real estate): CosmoLex for built-in trust accounting compliance.

High-volume practices (PI, immigration): LEAP or Smokeball for document automation.

Hourly billing practices: Consider automatic time tracking (Smokeball, ReadyDone, or Timely). Manual tracking loses 10-40% of billable time according to industry studies.

General practice: MyCase or PracticePanther cover most needs affordably.

By Priority

Budget: TimeSolv ($27/mo) or MyCase Basic ($39/mo)

Simplicity: PracticePanther

Automatic time tracking: Smokeball (with practice management), ReadyDone (standalone, zero-effort), or Timely (affordable but not legal-specific)

Built-in accounting: CosmoLex

Enterprise compliance: Laurel AI

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Clio worth the price?

For larger firms using most features and many integrations, yes. For solo or small firms, you likely pay for capabilities you never use. A solo on Clio Complete ($149/month) could get core functionality from MyCase Pro ($69/month) and save $960/year.

Can I migrate from Clio to another tool?

Yes. Most competitors offer migration assistance. Export contacts, matters, and billing data from Clio. Document migration typically requires manual transfer. Budget 2-4 weeks for full transition.

What is the best automatic time tracking for lawyers?

For most attorneys, ReadyDone offers the best combination of ease-of-use and effectiveness. It requires zero setup, zero behavior change, and captures time automatically from your normal work. Laurel AI is the enterprise alternative for AmLaw firms with compliance requirements. Smokeball bundles automatic tracking with practice management. Timely is the budget option but lacks legal-specific features.

Which Clio alternative has the best mobile app?

PracticePanther and MyCase get the strongest mobile reviews. Smokeball and LEAP are primarily desktop-focused.

Does ReadyDone replace Clio?

No. ReadyDone focuses on automatic time tracking for attorneys. It complements Clio or replaces just the time tracking component. You still need practice management for documents, calendaring, and matter management.


Try ReadyDone Free

If you lose billable hours to manual time tracking, ReadyDone captures time automatically from your screen activity. AI identifies your billable work and suggests entries. No timers. No manual entry. Just recovered revenue.

Start your free trial. No credit card required.


Related Resources:

Try ReadyDone Free

See how ReadyDone compares for yourself. Automatic time tracking built for attorneys.

Start Free Trial